<![CDATA[Operator&lt;]]>class TrInt { public: TrInt( int a_, int b_, int c_ ): a( a_ ), b(b_), c(c_) {} int a; int b; int c; bool operator<( const AInt& rhs ) const { if( a == rhs.a ) { if( b == rhs.b ) { return c < rhs.c; } return b < rhs.b; } return a < rhs.a; }

oder

class TrInt
{
public:
	TrInt( int a_, int b_, int c_ ): a( a_ ), b(b_), c(c_) {}
	int a;
	int b;
	int c;
    bool operator<( const TrInt& rhs ) const
	{
		if( a < rhs.a ) 
		{
			return true;
		}
		if( b < rhs.b ) 
		{
			return true;
		}
		if( c < rhs.c )
		{
		    return true;
		}
		return false;
	}
};

😮 😕

]]>https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/topic/156223/operator-ltRSS for NodeTue, 08 Sep 2026 18:09:56 GMTMon, 14 Aug 2006 19:05:57 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Operator&lt; on Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:05:57 GMT]]>class TrInt { public: TrInt( int a_, int b_, int c_ ): a( a_ ), b(b_), c(c_) {} int a; int b; int c; bool operator<( const AInt& rhs ) const { if( a == rhs.a ) { if( b == rhs.b ) { return c < rhs.c; } return b < rhs.b; } return a < rhs.a; }

oder

class TrInt
{
public:
	TrInt( int a_, int b_, int c_ ): a( a_ ), b(b_), c(c_) {}
	int a;
	int b;
	int c;
    bool operator<( const TrInt& rhs ) const
	{
		if( a < rhs.a ) 
		{
			return true;
		}
		if( b < rhs.b ) 
		{
			return true;
		}
		if( c < rhs.c )
		{
		    return true;
		}
		return false;
	}
};

😮 😕

]]>https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/1117221https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/1117221Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:05:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Operator&lt; on Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:20:54 GMT]]>die beiden varianten sind nicht äquivalent. für die 2.variante folgt im übrigen nicht aus a < b, dass b < a falsch ist.
die erste variante führt immer mindestens 2 vergleiche aus, sinnvoll könnte hier die umkehrung der reihenfolge sein:

bool operator<( const Trnt& rhs ) const
    {
        return a < rhs.a || a == rhs.a && ( b < rhs.b || b == rhs.b && c < rhs.c );
    }
]]>https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/1117234https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/1117234Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:20:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Operator&lt; on Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:31:58 GMT]]>😮 😮 😮
stimmt 👍

]]>https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/1117239https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/1117239Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:31:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Operator&lt; on Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:42:01 GMT]]>Boah da spar ich mindestens 3 Taktzyklen 🕶

]]>https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/1117243https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/1117243Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:42:01 GMT