<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[[FORTH] verschachtelte Wörterbuch-Definitionen?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hallo!</p>
<p>Sind in FORTH verschachtelte Wörterbuch-Definitionen erlaubt?</p>
<p>Also z.B:</p>
<pre><code>: average ( n n -- n ) + 2 : div ( n n -- n ) / ; div ;
</code></pre>
<p>Danke im Voraus</p>
<p>MfG<br />
May the forth be with you</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/topic/164280/forth-verschachtelte-wörterbuch-definitionen</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 19:30:50 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/topic/164280.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 18:42:15 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [FORTH] verschachtelte Wörterbuch-Definitionen? on Mon, 06 Nov 2006 18:42:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hallo!</p>
<p>Sind in FORTH verschachtelte Wörterbuch-Definitionen erlaubt?</p>
<p>Also z.B:</p>
<pre><code>: average ( n n -- n ) + 2 : div ( n n -- n ) / ; div ;
</code></pre>
<p>Danke im Voraus</p>
<p>MfG<br />
May the forth be with you</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/1169942</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/1169942</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[May the forth be with you]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 18:42:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [FORTH] verschachtelte Wörterbuch-Definitionen? on Tue, 07 Nov 2006 16:52:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Nein.</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/1170599</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/1170599</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mastercpp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 16:52:34 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>