<![CDATA[C++ BuilderX wohl doch ohne Forms-Designer, ohne wxWidgets-Support]]>Ich hatte mich schon langsam gefragt, wann Borland denn vorhat, aus dem BuilderX-"Preview" mal einen richtigen Builder zu machen. Eine nicht mehr taufrische Meldung bei Dr. Bob www.drbob42.com bringt Durchblick:

For those of you who didn't read the report from Paul Gustavson, the Meet The C++ Team session at BorCon 2004 was a very special session. The team was very open to us about C++Builder, C++BuilderX and the "forces of nature" (or Powers-That-Be) that influence their future.
The C++BuilderX summary: the C++ Team is currently working full-time on a free update for C++BuilderX users, called Boomerang. After that one, a new version will be made as well with more features and enhancements. One thing they could tell us about future changes is that the support for wxWindows is put on hold (probably forever), which may mean you won't have a native Windows designer for C++BuilderX.

Na ja, das war's dann wohl.

]]>https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/topic/87565/c-builderx-wohl-doch-ohne-forms-designer-ohne-wxwidgets-supportRSS for NodeSat, 04 Jul 2026 11:17:50 GMTFri, 01 Oct 2004 09:47:33 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to C++ BuilderX wohl doch ohne Forms-Designer, ohne wxWidgets-Support on Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:47:33 GMT]]>Ich hatte mich schon langsam gefragt, wann Borland denn vorhat, aus dem BuilderX-"Preview" mal einen richtigen Builder zu machen. Eine nicht mehr taufrische Meldung bei Dr. Bob www.drbob42.com bringt Durchblick:

For those of you who didn't read the report from Paul Gustavson, the Meet The C++ Team session at BorCon 2004 was a very special session. The team was very open to us about C++Builder, C++BuilderX and the "forces of nature" (or Powers-That-Be) that influence their future.
The C++BuilderX summary: the C++ Team is currently working full-time on a free update for C++BuilderX users, called Boomerang. After that one, a new version will be made as well with more features and enhancements. One thing they could tell us about future changes is that the support for wxWindows is put on hold (probably forever), which may mean you won't have a native Windows designer for C++BuilderX.

Na ja, das war's dann wohl.

]]>https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/618683https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/618683Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:47:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to C++ BuilderX wohl doch ohne Forms-Designer, ohne wxWidgets-Support on Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:12:53 GMT]]>Ich hab' mich mit dem BuilderX noch nicht auseinandergesetzt, aber bedeutet das jetzt, dass man wieder alle Oberflächenelemente per API, zur Laufzeit erzeugen muss -> kein RAD mehr?? Wo ist da der Witz??

]]>https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/618703https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/618703Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:12:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to C++ BuilderX wohl doch ohne Forms-Designer, ohne wxWidgets-Support on Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:05:23 GMT]]>der witzt war doch plattformunabhänigkeit 🙄

]]>https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/618917https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/618917Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:05:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to C++ BuilderX wohl doch ohne Forms-Designer, ohne wxWidgets-Support on Fri, 01 Oct 2004 20:33:24 GMT]]>Also ein plattformunabhängiger Text-Editor, der einen wählbaren C++-Compiler starten kann.

Das ist in der Tat ein Witz 😃

]]>https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/619124https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/619124Fri, 01 Oct 2004 20:33:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to C++ BuilderX wohl doch ohne Forms-Designer, ohne wxWidgets-Support on Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:15:04 GMT]]>na ein bisschen mehr kann der

aber ich finds schad das die codeguard nicht wie im cbuilder6 intergriet haben

]]>https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/619170https://www.c-plusplus.net/forum/post/619170Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:15:04 GMT