[Boost] Bekanntmachungen



  • Will hier einen Thread aufmachen, der die Boost-Bekanntmachungen enthält, um Interessierte ohne Mailinglisten- bzw. Newsgroup-Abo zu informieren.



  • The formal review of the Boost TR1 Library by John Maddock begins today,
    Saturday, September 24th, and runs through Wednesday, October 5th.

    The TR1 library provides an implementation of the C++ Technical Report on
    Standard Library Extensions. This library does not itself implement the TR1
    components, rather it's a thin wrapper that will include your standard
    library's TR1 implementation (if it has one), otherwise it will include the
    Boost Library equivalents, and import them into namespace std::tr1.
    Functionality supported includes:

    * Reference Wrappers
    * Smart Pointers
    * Class template result_of.
    * Function template mem_fn.
    * Function Object Binders.
    * Polymorphic function wrappers.
    * Type Traits.
    * Random Number Generators and Distributions.
    * Tuples.
    * Tuple Interface to std::pair.
    * Fixed Size Array.
    * Hash Function Objects.
    * Regular Expressions.
    * Complex Number Algorithm Overloads.
    * Complex Number Additional Algorithms.

    Functionality in TR1 but not yet available:

    * Mathematical Special Functions.
    * Unordered Associative Set (Hash Table).
    * Unordered Associative Map (Hash Table).
    * C99 C language additions.

    Additional information including online documentation is available at
    http://freespace.virgin.net/boost.regex/tr1/index.html

    The complete TR1 lib source and docs can be downloaded from
    http://freespace.virgin.net/boost.regex/tr1/tr1-20050816.zip

    Please help Boost by posting your formal review of this library.

    Your comments may be brief or lengthy, but basically the Review Manager
    needs your evaluation of the library. If you identify problems along the
    way, please note if they are minor, serious, or showstoppers.

    Here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

    * What is your evaluation of the design?
    * What is your evaluation of the implementation?
    * What is your evaluation of the documentation?
    * What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library?
    * Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have
    any problems?
    * How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick
    reading? In-depth study?
    * Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?

    And finally, every review should answer this question:

    * Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library? Be
    sure to say this explicitly so that your other comments don't obscure your
    overall opinion.

    --Beman Dawes, Review Manager



  • Hi All,

    I am happy to announce that xpressive has been accepted into boost.

    That being said I would like to thank Eric for writing such a high
    quality library and all the reviewers for the significant time they
    spent in reviewing the library. I have received some very detailed in
    depth reviews of the library. This has made my job really easy. Thanks!

    While xpressive is accepted without conditions I'd like to point out
    that the test coverage should be improved in the future.

    Thomas

    Review Manager xpressive

    Thomas Witt



  • Artchi schrieb:

    Will hier einen Thread aufmachen, der die Boost-Bekanntmachungen enthält, um Interessierte ohne Mailinglisten- bzw. Newsgroup-Abo zu informieren.

    bring den leuten doch bitte bei, wie man ne mailingliste benutzt.



  • jup, stört.


Anmelden zum Antworten